Post by Arguleon Veq on Jul 13, 2010 15:33:51 GMT -5
So with a new set of rules I thought it was time I got back on here.
What are your general thoughts on the new rules? What do you like/dislike? How do you see you having to change your armies now?
To be honest I dont think this rule set was needed in the slightest, all that was needed was some changes to terrain rules and some streamlining of the movement rules.
I am going to have to do a major re-work of all my armies which is of course a pain and no doubt the reason for the rules change.
I see a lot of games now either being a slow grind of big weak stubborn infantry units losing but holding to elite infantry, a slow push until one point in the enemy line breaks and a unit can get around the flanks and disrupt. Stone thrower artillery wars as a pre-curser to any combat.
I think there will also be more early game massacres though thanks to some super spells and a very unpredictable magic system.
What are your general thoughts on the new rules? What do you like/dislike? How do you see you having to change your armies now?
To be honest I dont think this rule set was needed in the slightest, all that was needed was some changes to terrain rules and some streamlining of the movement rules.
I am going to have to do a major re-work of all my armies which is of course a pain and no doubt the reason for the rules change.
I see a lot of games now either being a slow grind of big weak stubborn infantry units losing but holding to elite infantry, a slow push until one point in the enemy line breaks and a unit can get around the flanks and disrupt. Stone thrower artillery wars as a pre-curser to any combat.
I think there will also be more early game massacres though thanks to some super spells and a very unpredictable magic system.
)